Tag Archives: RX100M3

Different approaches to a wall

How many ways can we photograph a blank wall? It’s not a very-very blank wall…there is something that we can use to “custom” it: in this case there are two road signs.

Here is the “track”..and, as we are speacking about Street Photographs, we need a human subject.

LRG_DSC01485

A “classical” approach: follow a direction:

LRG_DSC01481

A countercurrent...a salmon ūüôā

LRG_DSC01461

A moving countercurrent… if you want an “artistc” picture!

LRG_DSC01484

More motion? Very simple:¬† wait for a fast¬†cyclist ( always as “artistic” picture! )

LRG_DSC01467

…uhhhmmmm… there something missig: a car or 2 persons ( there are 2 signals on the wall ) or, better, a person with a blue/white dress (!)… The main key is “Fantasy”! With fantasy we can “paint” (photograph) a simple blank wall in 1000 ways. For this example I used a Sony Rx100M3.

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Advertisements

Follow ( interesting ) people..

..in effect..I didn’t follow that guy..because he was sat down at the corner. We can say that I followed his behavior: he was in the backlight, he was smoking…and there were lines of light toward him: a very good photographic scene.

So I took my little Sony RX100M3 ( a very little, but powerful camera ) and I waited for the right moment: a little smoke from his mouth.. here is a good photo: a profile made of light, geometric lines…and a little point of interest: the smoke.
Other important notes: only in the morning there is this type of light..the sun is low on the horizon ( so we have long shadows ) … there are few people on the street.. I had a little camera so the subject didn’t notice me ūüôā ūüôā

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Pict of the day on http://www.maxartis.com

Great camera means Great photo?

You don’t need a great camera to take a great photo as you don’t need a big paintbrush to color a big painting. I have a question:¬†“how was the giant Goliath killed?”, with a big cannon? No, with a little rock. Last sunday I took the following pictures with a little compact camera, a Sony RX100M3, not with a Nikon D5 or a¬†Canon EOS 5D Mark IV.

I had a big help: the morning lights! ūüôā But I had to wake very early in the morning..and the “good light” last few minutes… In the evening I edited the RAW files them with Lightroom.

“Take the rose when it’s time, that the time, you know, flying and the same flower that blooms today, tomorrow will wither” ( Carpe Diem, italian poet Orazio)

dsc01016

Reflection in the lake

dsc01007

Landscape in the morning

Fujifilm X100T VS Sony Rx100M3 in Street Photography

Fujifilm X100T VS Sony Rx100M3 in Street Photography: which is the best?

I like very much the Street Photography and I have to choose between two cameras: X100T and Rx100M3…so…which is the best for this kind of photography?

In the following table my personal considerations:

senza-titolo

First of all both of them were produced in 2014..so the technology is the same. I have a sufficient “budget” to buy the more expensive? (Ok…yes). The dimension is important because I need a camera that I can always carry with me…the X100T on this point is very good…while the RX100 for my is a little too small. The dimension of the sensor is very important: big sensor means better ISO. The tiltable screen is useful but not essential…like the image stabilization: if you have a lens with a high aperture you don’t need the stabilization. Wireless is very useful, but in any case you can by a wireless SD. I don’t consider the zoom because the best lens for street photography is 35 or 28.

A very difficult decision! So I bought the Fujifilm X100T as my first main camera..and the Rx100M3 as a second camera ( very small I can carry in my¬†jacket or coat .. always..and I can¬†use it¬†as a photographic “block notes”).

RAW vs JPEG on Sony RX100M3

A promised in the previous post, here is two pictures…

RAW ( edited with Lightroom )

dsc00928

JPEG ( Auto Mode )

dsc00929

I think that the picture in JPEG is OK…for a ready-to-use picture.¬†

The fundamental question of (digital) life

JPEG or RAW ? How many times I heard this question!! Who is the winner? And the Oscar goes to ….¬† the answer is: it depends! There is not a winner. Both of them have pro and cons… I don’t want to publish¬†a bare¬†standard table with pro&cons but I want to speak about real-life samples. Generally speaking RAW has a lot of pro…but..

I.e. I’m a professional sport photographer and during a race I shot hundreds of pictures and I have to choose and send them to a newspaper as soon as possible. So I have not time to convert/edit them from RAW to JPEG (remember that a RAW file is very-very large )…so I use JPEG but I set my camera to give me a good JPG: i.e.¬† adjust contrast/saturation/white balance/size. Some year ago I¬†attended to a workshop held by Ivo Saglietti¬† and he said us to use only JPEG: the reason was that we have to concentrate only on the composition of the image and not on the editing.¬† Here my reportage in JPEG.

On the opposite I have time to edit the RAW…so I want to work in photoshop with the most quality of my pictures. Here the advantage of RAW is that I can edit/correct the file without big reduction in quality. Remember that everytime you save a JPEG file the software , that you used for editing, reduces it! ¬†Yes! It’s the definition of a JPEG file: a compressed file with loss of quality ( also a ZIP file is a compressed file…but the compression is lossles: we can restore the original file). In the case you¬†are using¬†a JPEG file, my suggestion is to to save it in the default format of the software you are using: i.e PSD for Photoshop. So the next time you edit and save it, you will¬†not have quality reduction.

This is not an advertising! I have a Sony RX100M3 and if I want a good JPEG picture I can¬†set¬† on of¬† the Default Scene ( i.e. Sport,Landscape,Sunset …. ) or the Superior / Intelligent Auto mode. In my next post I’ll show some pictures in those settings ( versus and edited RAW).